Alban Home Inspection Service
Home
Environmental Testing
Virtual Tour
Resources
Testimonials
Gazette Article
Current Newsletter
Client Referrals
Contact Us
800-822-7200, 301-662-6565
the gazette articles

Gazette Articles - February 28, 2006

GAZETTE Newspapers
By: Arthur S. Lazerow

Air Conditioner Efficiency Standard Raised 

Several real estate office managers recently asked me to research how the federally mandated increase in energy efficiency for newly manufactured central air conditioning systems to SEER 13 will impact real estate transactions.  The larger question, of course, is what will be the impact on property owners as older, less efficient equipment need replacement?

Prior to January 13, 2006, the energy efficiency rating for air conditioning systems, known as SEER, or Seasonal Energy Efficiency Rating, was SEER 10, meaning that no central A/C equipment could be manufactured with an efficiency lower than 10.  That standard was raised to SEER 13 and became effective on January 23, 2006.  The higher the number, the less energy the air conditioning system utilizes.  This is good for the environment and good for occupants’ pocket books.  But the law of unexpected consequences rears its ugly head!

After researching this issue and discussing it with my favorite HVAC contractor, it appears that on the near term, there should be no significant impact on homeowners or on the sale of a residential property when air conditioning equipment becomes dysfunctional.

Here’s the problem in a nutshell. A central air conditioning system is identified as barely operating or non-functioning because of a compressor or condenser problem in the outside unit.  If it is either not repairable due to age or the repair parts are not available, the condenser would have to be replaced.  But the new SEER 13 condensing units may not be compatible with the coil of the inside air handler, requiring a costly total system replacement.

HISTORY:  This issue has been a political football.  After a seven-year review period during the Clinton Administration, the SEER rating of 13 was approved.  In 2001, the Bush Administration, bowing to industry pressure, ordered a rollback to SEER 12, but the 2nd Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals overturned this on January 13, 2004.  On March 17, 2004, the Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Institute withdrew its legal appeal of the SEER 13 Standard, which permitted the SEER 13 regulation to become effective. 

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS FOR PROPERTY OWNERS.    Repair parts are available for all common makes of A/C equipment.  In addition, there is currently a sufficient supply of replacement condensing units with SEER 10 or higher ratings and with lower prices should a condensing unit need replacing this summer. 

My heating contractor compared this situation to the automobile industry.  Current models contain components that are improved from an energy utilization or modernization viewpoint, but repair parts remain available to fix older equipment.  Bear in mind that the new regulations only prohibit the manufacture of A/C systems rated less than SEER 13.  They do not require the upgrade of defective less-efficient equipment and they do not prohibit the repair of older, existing equipment. 

ESTIMATED SAVINGS.  There is no doubt that down the road, as inventories of replacement SEER 10 equipment are dissipated, there will be no alternative to switching to the more efficient models.  A switch from SEER 8 to SEER 13 equipment is estimated to save about 62% and a switch from SEER 10 to SEER 13 equipment will save about 25% on the cost of energy.  With today’s high cost of electricity, especially during the summer air conditioning season, these represent significant savings.

The issue becomes is what to do with older equipment this year.  Glen Hourahan, vice-president for technology at Air Conditioning Contractors of America, pointed out that “if the equipment is more than 10 years old and (an owner) is starting to have difficulties with it, they might want to look into replacing it this year, even if it hasn’t failed yet.”  The first few years of manufacturing of the higher efficiency SEER 13 models will undoubtedly be more expensive than SEER 10 equipment, which is currently still available.  He estimates a 20-30% increase in installed prices.  Homeowners living with a tight budget may want to replace outmoded equipment while a less expensive alternative to SEER 13 equipment remains available.

Many people, however, with an eye on improving energy efficiency and the resultant savings in operating costs, will definitely want to upgrade older, inefficient equipment with a SEER 13 or above system.  SEER 13 is not the maximum efficiency.  Lennox has a SEER 19 unit. 

Have a question relating to a housing or environmental issue?  To contact Mr. Lazerow, click on “Contact Us” at Albaninspect.com.  Mention “Gazette Newspapers” in your question.  Every question will be answered and some will be included in this column. 


Arthur Lazerow, president of Alban Home Inspection Service, Inc., is a nationally certified ASHI home inspector, having performed more than 6000 inspections during the past 11 years. 

Previous Issues

 

Home Buyer Information
Mission of an Inspector
Need Advice
Realtor Seminars
Schedule an Inspection
Integrity in Home Inspecting, Confidence in Home Owning The ASHI Experience